Choose Tools > Adjust Size, then select Resample image. Back to normal I dont like the new ones needs go back how do it dont like the big pictures on facebook.In the Preview app on your Mac, open the file you want to change. Here 1440 X 2560 means this photo has 1440 pixels in width and 2560 pixels in height.If there is one thing I get asked, and that has been answered online time and again, it's "How do I get my photos to look like I want them to look on Facebook?" followed immediately by "Why does Facebook ruin my photos anyway?" and finally "I just want my photos to look awesome on Facebook." The bottom line is, Facebook does give us options, loopholes if you like, and we just need to adhere to them and our images will look stellar. But, what are these magical settings? I decided I was going to fuse my two careers together into one article, and explain it all as best I can.Facebook has gone fullscreen in (Mac) Safari. If you have taken photos with a high-end digital camera, it may take photos with a pixel size of 1440 X 2560 or 3560 X 1440. In many places, you will need to resize the image, like in job applications, or to fit images with your PC screen resolution.In this walkthrough we will take a wide panorama image from the Grand Canyon and resize it from a very large wide resolution to a smaller image resolution, reducing the image dimensions and file size in the process. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what youre looking.How to Resize a Photo on Mac. Let's start with some history, because thorough knowledge is better than hasty knowledge.Search the worlds information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Assuming Facebook doesn't change these anytime soon, here are the full details on what I do (at least) to make my images on my Facebook Page look clear, sharp, and with minimal or no data compression, as of December 13, 2014. Tip: To reduce the file size of multiple images at the same time, display the images in the same window, select them in that window. The new size is shown at the bottom.
I started working as a web designer in 1997, and worked on my last website project as recently as 2013, and I can tell you that showing images on the web isn't as linear and simple as one might think. Having some background in web design would help you as a photographer striving to showcase their work online, but not everyone has that luxury. The Technical StuffNote: If you don't want to bother learning about the technical aspects of file types and image data on the web, and just want to make your photos look better on Facebook, skip this section and scroll down.Now then, when you discuss photos on Facebook, you are really discussing image data on the internet, broadly speaking. JPG image quality can vary wildly depending on the compression settings, so don't discount it as a good format for your images. JPG is what is known as a "lossy compression format", or a file type that utilizes data compression to decrease overall file size, but at the sacrifice of image quality (sharpness, smoothness, color consistency, etc) That said, just because JPG uses data compression, it does not mean that a minimally compressed JPG file is "bad" or "low quality". Keep in mind, JPG was originally JPEG, which is an acronym for Joint Photographers Expert Group, the committee that created the file type standard. JPGLet's start with the one you've probably heard of (well, mostly likely anyway, since your camera can create these types of files), which is the industry standard JPG. So, to make it simpler, we will only discuss the file types that relate to images on the web, and more specifically file types that matter on Facebook. File TypesThere are bonkers amounts of digital image (raster) file types in the world, for every industry from film to websites to medicine, and it can hit you with the subtlety of a squadron of flying mallets when you first dive in to the subject. Download adobe audition cc 2014While the GIF format is extremely limited in color (can only support up to 256 total colors in any given file, or said another way, less than. In modern times it was given a stay of execution, in terms of common usage, because of one main reason: it supports animated sequences via sequential frames. Use the slider to compare, and note that the 100 quality version is 445kb and the 0 quality version is 31kb.We don't want our images looking like the 0 quality version, dang it! GIFNext up is GIF, which stands for Graphics Interchange Format, and is different from JPG in many ways. This extremely antiquated file type (first introduced by CompuServe in 1987) made its way onto the internet via goofy, simplistic graphics in the web's infancy. Want to know even more technical details? I recommend you start with the Wikipedia entry about JPEG (warning: heavy reading).Check out the same file as a JPG compressed to quality 100 (minimal compression) and a JPG compressed to quality 0 (maximum compression). Play pubg on emulator macWhich is great because GIF does diddly squat for us photographers showcasing our work online. And although GIF supports transparent pixels, as it were, it is seldom used for this purpose since it has been effectively replaced by PNG for that purpose. Video sequences can be converted into comparatively smaller sized GIFs, though with a signifcant quality loss and no audio, and can play on any browser, so this format perseveres. Heck, now we have entire websites dedicated the fascination of " Funny GIFs". ![]() And This Means What on Facebook?You want your images to look as amazing on Facebook as they do in Photoshop, or at least darn close, but lo and behold, Facebook makes merry with your images when you upload them and now they look like poop. Photographers, not so much. Even the most militant digital photophile would be hard pressed to tell the difference between them, but the fact remains that the PNG is almost exactly twice as large as the JPG.PNG-24 also supports something called alpha transparency, which is hugely useful and used regularly by web designers. You can get jiggy with the details about PNG as well, if again you are so inclined.Check out this 2048x1365 px image as a minimally compressed JPG (2.3MB) vs a PNG-24 (4.4MB). The upshot is that image quality is not compromised, but keep in mind that the same pixel dimension JPG file at minimal compression is always quite a bit smaller than a PNG-24 at the same pixel dimensions. And that figure is likely quite a lot higher. I'll pause a second to let that sink in. Facebook receives (no joke) well over 100,000,000 image uploads per day. Well, the answer is simple practicality. ![]() The bad news is, you are a photographer, and you notice. We worry that potential clients may see it and think "This isn't very sharp, I dunno that I like this photographer's work very much."The good news is, most potential clients can't tell the difference. So when we first upload that epic, super sharp, colorful image of the bride & groom from the most recent gig, and Facebook kicks in and resizes and compresses it, we feel threatened.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTerry ArchivesCategories |